Tag Archives: Floyd Central Bagpiper

RoboCop reboot underwhelms audience

By Caitlin Fien

On Feb 12th, the remake of the original 1987 RoboCop was released into theaters. Having not seen the original, I went into the movie expecting to see a film filled with action scenes and a robotic policeman. While the movie, directed by José Padilha, did have very intense action scenes and slick, smooth design elements,  it chose to focus on the emotional human nature of the man behind the suit.

The movie clearly tries to make a political statement about the future that lies in robotics for America and the world.  In the year 2028, the battle droid creations of Mr. Raymond Sellars, CEO of the multi-billion dollar robotics company, OmniCorp, are deployed in foreign countries.  These robots that promote ‘safety’ replace the human soldiers and are supposed to save thousands of lives in war-torn nations. In reality America has forced the world to submit to their robo-bullies that feel nothing, even if they kill a child or an innocent person.  In the opening scene, Pat Novak (Samuel L. Jackson) is a radical conservative who hosts a Fox News-esque show that spreads propaganda from the Pentagon. He promotes the use of robots in America and ignores the liberals who offer counter-arguments. The problem for him and like minded individuals are those darned liberals and their bills in Congress that outlaw robots.

The billion dollar company, OmniCorp, is looking for a way around the Dreyfus Act, which prohibits the use of drones on U.S. soil. Sellars wants to ‘put a man inside the machine.’ This is where Alex Murphy (Joel Kinnaman), a cop from Detroit, almost fatally injured by an explosion, comes into the picture.  The company approaches his wife, and wanting to keep her husband alive,  she agrees.  He then becomes property of a company and this head, lungs, esophagus and one remaining hand are encased and held together by a shiny black suit.

Alex responds to the situations with slower processing speeds in battle than the drones, due to the time his brain takes to make decisions on a human scale. His brain is altered and his dopamine levels reduced, making him almost exactly like a robot, just with organic parts.  The human emotions inside him cause him to override the system and he begins investigating his own attempted murder, which leads him to corruption in the police department. He also begins to feel love from his family and the hatred towards the corrupt company that tries to shut him down once he is no longer profitable.

The movie poses the questions of who is in control, the man or the machine. As technology increases, the reality of robots existing in society with humans comes closer into sight. The fear of robots held by many people throughout the film conflicts with the benefits of the RoboCop, who is seen as a hero in the public’s eye. It seems to highlight the things that could go wrong with the technology rather than the things that could go right.

The acting is not bad; in fact, the supporting actors are very effective in their roles.  My favorite character was Dr. Dennett Norton, played by Gary Oldman. His portrayal of the doctor conflicted by doing what is morally right and doing what will bring his creation glory really showed the error in human judgement that is always present. This error is what allows humans to not be ruthless machines. I enjoyed Oldman’s performance, while the lead, Kinnaman, did nothing to impress me.  It may have been how silly the suit made his face look, but he seemed to lack the right emotion at the right times.

I am not a fan of movies when you can tell exactly how long it will be before the movie ends.  Its ending was rather predictable, and when the lights of the theater came up, I was left wondering ‘why?’ Why was it necessary to make this movie?  While it wasn’t as terrible as it could have been for a remake, there was nothing special about it. Worse than being a bad movie is being just an alright one, and RoboCop left me with nothing but the taste of mediocrity in my mouth.

Mary Beth Tinker encourages students to take a stand

By Brooke McAfee

Local teenagers and community members got a civics lesson on the First Amendment on Wednesday.

In 1965, a 13-year-old girl named Mary Beth Tinker wore a black armband to her school in Des Moines, Iowa to mourn the dead on both sides of the Vietnam War. She was suspended, along with several other students, for this peaceful act of protest. In 1969, the case went to the Supreme Court, where it was ruled that students and teachers have First Amendment rights within school. The Tinker v. Des Moines case has made a significant impact upon the freedom of students to express their thoughts and ideas.

Tinker, as a part of her tour around the country, spoke at Indiana University Southeast at 7 p.m. Wednesday to educate people about student’s rights and encourage young people to start speaking up for what they believe in. Along with the Vietnam War, she also witnessed racial discrimination towards African-Americans during her childhood, and many people advocated for civil rights.

Mary Beth Tinker speaks about the First Amendment and the Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case at the Indiana University Southeast Ogle Center Wednesday night. Tinker's speech was part of the Tinker Tour, sponsored by the Student Press Law Center. Photo by Noble Guyon.
Mary Beth Tinker speaks about the First Amendment and the Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case at the Indiana University Southeast Ogle Center Wednesday night. Tinker’s speech was part of the Tinker Tour, sponsored by the Student Press Law Center. Photo by Noble Guyon.

“There were so many young people speaking out and standing up. It was when I was growing up, in the early 1960s. It seemed like everyone around me was a strong, brave, courageous person,” she said.

Tinker, who described herself as shy, did not begin speaking out until the issue of the black armbands came up. After the case was won, she grew up without understanding the full significance of the court decision. As an adult, she realized the effect it has had upon the United States.

“I slowly began to see that our case is part of a larger issue, of civil liberties, of children’s rights, of human rights. I started to see that there are young people all over the country who are standing up for their rights- all over the world. And I started meeting some of them, and I started talking to them about some of things they are speaking up about,” said Tinker.

Attorney Mike Hiestand, who is traveling with Tinker on the tour sponsored by the Student Press Law Center in Washington, D.C., encouraged students to speak out.

“When you feel something from so deep within, from the very core of your heart, you need to say what you need to say. It is so important…young people have a message that we as adults have sometimes forgotten,” said Hiestand.

Many teenagers are passionate about causing change, according to Tinker.

“Young people want to make things better,” she said.

The Tinker v. Des Moines case has had a particularly significant effect upon student journalists.

“It has affected anyone who is in the [journalism] business or anyone in a high school situation where they have tried to give some sort of expression of themselves,” said journalist Jarod Clapp, a reporter for the New Albany Tribune covering the event.

Clapp said that students need to take advantage of their freedom to speak up.

“It’s just as important as it is for anyone else to stick up for their opinions. If you don’t stand up for what you believe in, what you believe in may disappear,” said Clapp.

Although speaking one’s mind can often lead to negative responses from others, Tinker said she thinks discussion between those of different beliefs can lead to tolerance.

“We are trying to have peace in the world, in our communities, in our schools, so we want conversations, so people don’t just yell at each other,” she said.

Joseph Dever, an IUS and FC graduate who attended the speech, said Tinker has had a major impact on him and the people around him.

“As a journalism student I’ve always been inspired by Mary Beth Tinker. It’s been really crazy hearing about her experience, and just seeing the change that she’s brought. What she does is so important to the students- to inspire them to take a stand, and express themselves. That’s one of the most important things for people to learn,” said Dever.

Dever said the First Amendment rights lead to a more successful society.

“I think it is important because everyone has the right to express what they think- they have the freedom to do that. I think when, as a society, we place limits on people, we place limits on society. I think society thrives from free press and free people,” he said.

IUS senior Rebecca Egger said standing up for one’s beliefs is an important part of learning and growing as an individual.

“I think it is important because they are people just like anyone, and they deserve to have their voice heard. I think when their voice isn’t heard, it can cause students to be discouraged, and I think, in some ways, it can inhibit you from trying and from pushing yourself forward and learning.”

One of the main points made throughout the speech, by both Tinker and Hiestand, was the importance of students realizing and acting upon their First Amendment rights.

“She is certainly part of history, but the thing we are trying to remind students of is that she’s part of history, but it’s a history that is ongoing. Her case is the law of the land today, that’s been cited over 6000 times…the rights that her case helped win are the rights that we are really trying to remind students that they exist today,” said Hiestand.

Boys basketball players preview upcoming season with their new coach

By Sydney Sears and Delaney Smith

As the boys basketball players trudge out of another practice their sore muscles let them know they have given the day their all.

With a new coach and fresh faces, FC awaits the upcoming season.  The players have a new mindset and are more determined than ever to have a successful season. The boys are adjusting to a new schedule, workout program, and coach in this upcoming season.

“I like what Coach Lieberman has come in and started doing. It’s really affected the team by all of us being in much better shape than we were before, and it’s helping us improve as athletes,” said senior Zane Nichols.

Coach Mark Lieberman has instilled a novice practice and workout schedule for the players. They practice every day of the week except Sunday. Lieberman said that the new workouts have resulted in improved strength throughout the entire team.

“He has us on a conditioning program that we can almost be positive no one else is doing,” said junior Brandon Smith.

Lieberman expressed his ideas on improvement and working hard. He said that he believes that they can outwork any team they will play this season. Lieberman shared that the team will work hard, compete, and find ways to outwork their opponents this season.

“I’m always looking for gradual improvement,” he said.

With all this hard work, team members are excited to see what will happen on the court.

“I’m just excited for the upcoming season to start. I want to know where all of this hard work that we’ve been putting in is going to get us,” said Nichols.

Though Lieberman cannot predict an outcome for the season, he promised hard work and dedication.

“We will play hard. I do know that,” he said.

The varsity team’s first official game of the season is at home against New Albany at 7:30 on Friday, Dec. 13.

Highlanders have mixed feelings on new breaks

By Bryce Romig

Since the New Albany-Floyd County school board decided to implement a balanced calendar, small changes are slowly making way with each new school year. Students will now receive an additional two-week break during October, as well as an extra week added onto spring break in March.

“I like that we finally get a fall break, and finally have a longer spring break,” said senior Savannah O’Brien.

The normal breaks such as winter break and Thanksgiving break will still be in effect. Winter break will be the typical two weeks long, as well as Thanksgiving break’s normal three days off.

“I love having two weeks off, but getting started after we come back will be hard. I’m anxious to see how things will play out,” said history teacher William Russell.

Principal Janie Whaley said the school corporation moved to the new calendar for academic reasons.

“The main reason why there was a switch to a balanced calendar is to help catch kids up, offer opportunities to help kids dig themselves out of a hole, and eliminate failures,” said Whaley. “It also gives teachers time to recharge.”

Aside from the longer breaks during the school year, some students are distraught over the increasingly short summer break, which is now six weeks long. In order to implement the new schedule, the school corporation had to shorten summer vacation.

“I like it. However, I wish that our summers were longer,” said freshman Morgan Paul.

In previous years, students would normally be headed back to school around the Aug. 12. Summer used to be two months and two weeks long, with the exception of snow days. 

“I like that we have longer breaks, but I don’t like that we have to come back from summer earlier, because I like summer the best,” said junior Katie Tarr.

Other students approve of the upcoming extended breaks.

“I like the new breaks because they are more spread out. It doesn’t really bother me because we still get the same amount of days off so it’s not like they took away our breaks from school,” said sophomore Lexi Fennimore.

By the fall of 2014, the new balanced calendar should be in full effect.

“I think the breaks are long enough now. We get two weeks, so I kind of like the whole deal,” said Fennimore.

However, Whaley points out that the periodic break may also be beneficial to teachers.

“Teaching is draining and when you get to a certain point within the school year weekends aren’t enough. Teaching is a performance. When you are giving performances every day, you need time to recharge.”