All posts by jlang@nafcs.k12.in.us

Columnist criticizes Facebook

By Meghan Poff

I'm Just Saying

Dear Mark Zuckerburg,

You owe me big time. If you ever want to make it up to me, just send a nice check to my therapist. But I bet she doesn’t like you either. Because of you, every Monday, Thursday and Saturday from 3- 4:30 p.m., she has had to listen to me talk about how much I hate Facebook.

Don’t be too hard on yourself though. You had a really good idea, in your head. You just forgot to take some important variables into account.

  1. People think that others care about what they have to say.
  2. People don’t care about what others have to say.
  3. People think what they have to say is important to others.
  4. People could not care less about what is important to others.

However, it is not too late to save Facebook. Just take my advice, please I am begging you, and your website just might come back from MySpace level.

  1. The Dislike button- The like button only looks really successful because of the fact that there is no dislike button. Because only about 1 out of every 10 times do I actually like a status, and this does not account for the other 9 times that I do not like a status. (*The dislike button can also apply to relationship statuses)
  2. Take away people’s ability to say where they are and who they are with- Because, well, no one cares.
  3. Automatically make wall posts between couples private- As to avoid that awkward moment when you throw up your breakfast after seeing “Yay it’s our two day anniversary! I love you baby!”
  4. Automatic spell-check statuses- Sometimes I get confused when I see, “weekend wuz wy 2 fast dont wanna go 2 skwl tommrw.” Similarly, I almost forget what language I am supposed to be speaking when I see, “mE n D@RReLL b LighTin sHizz ^ in d@ cLUb.”
  5. Tell annoying girls to stop talking about their feelings and go PMS elsewhere- I have had enough of all this, “I’m tired of getting my heart broken by someone that never cared about me.” and “Guys need to know how to treat a lady right. Smh.” I have added up the figures, and by my calculations, there is a reason you are single.

I have re-read all of my key points, and I really do not think any of them are that unrealistic, so if you could make this happen for me, that would be nice. I feel like a lot of people could really benefit from these changes but mostly I feel like if you do this, I might be able to lean off of my anger management medication a bit.

Please and Thank You,

Meghan Poff

Writer requests respect

By Darian Eswine

Graphic by Summer Haynes

Chivalry: courteous behavior, that of a man towards a woman.

Simple definition. Theoretically it would be simple enough to carry out this behavior. Courteousness should not be hard. It’s just a boy being nice to a girl which to me sounds like a natural act; however, a chivalrous man is now a dying breed.

These days, a lot of women want to do everything for themselves. I still believe you can take care of yourself and let the man be the man.

I am not a feminist and I want to be taken care of in certain ways. I want my knight in shining armor, I want to be saved from the tower, and I want to ride off into the seemingly endless sunset after romantically being saved from an unrealistically perilous situation.

Although slightly cheesy, it provides me with the most satisfying end to my life story. Now my message to boys out there is: you are brutally annihilating my dream. I’m speaking generally here; not every single boy is impolite to women, but the numbers do seem to be increasing.

I cannot provide a reason for the dwindling acts of chivalry being seen in the school hallways and in the world, but I can provide a few simple tips, other than the basic opening doors and pulling chairs out, to transform you into the Prince Charming every man should be.

1) Be buff, carry stuff

Books are just the beginning to this courteous act. A guy can carry books, backpacks, and food. Yes, food. If a girl is at a restaurant and she gets take out, it would be appropriate for the man to go up and get the order even if it’s not his order. No, I don’t mean some random guy at McDonalds should go get the girl’s food. This only applies to girls who are with the guy at the restaurant. A man can carry shopping bags, heavy boxes, and the list goes on and on. It is a simple act that could brighten the day.

2) Put a cork in it

Inappropriate language is just that: inappropriate. It does not belong around a girl. I could say so much more on this topic. Curse words, slang, sexual references, and sexist jokes all are to be kept out of earshot of women, and preferably never said…at all. Girls should have clean mouths as well, but that is another problem for another day. Think about what you say before you say it and the world of men will be a better place.

3) Walk this way

This is the number one most forgotten rule of chivalry. It dates back to the horse and buggy age where men walked on the side of the road closest to the buggies. That way, if a wheel splashed a puddle or a horse went rabid, the male would be on the protective side of the woman. This applies to modern times as well. Some women might not even recognize this, but I do. It makes me have a much higher opinion of the man if he moves purposefully to put himself in between me and the cars.

For 18 years I have watched my dad treat my mom with these basic courtesies. I fully expect my male friends, boyfriends, and future husband to treat me with the same respect.

Men were meant to take care of women and I am nothing if not conventional. These three tips coupled with basic good manners will show you are a respectful, courteous gentleman and will most definitely help you win your princess.

Writer gives ideal political situation

By Garrett Receveur

The national debt stands at over 14 trillion dollars. Unemployment stands at 9.1 percent. The global economy is eroding away. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg warns that, as riots engulf Europe, New York City may be next.

The time for solutions to solve these problems is now. Barack Obama is entering the last year of his first term as president with disapproval for him and his administration rapidly increasing.

If Obama wants to remain in the White House for another term, he has to make significant headway in bringing our nation’s problems under control. He has to stop golfing and start leading.

It now seems that Obama is trying to come up with a viable solution.

His proposal is focused on eliminating three trillion dollars from our national debt over the next decade. Plans include a heavier tax on the wealthy, reductions on Medicare, and removing troops from Iraq and Afghanistan.

These proposals to fix our country are in danger of falling into a partisan trap with Republicans trying to mar Obama’s image by destroying every facet of Obama’s proposals and with Democrats willing to pass anything to keep Obama in the White House.

Obviously, this is a gross over-simplification of the matter. There are proposals that Republicans agree with and some that Democrats disagree with.

There are going to be disagreements with Obama’s plan on both sides of the political spectrum, no one denies that. However, these disagreements need to be on the basis of what is best for the country, not on what voters want.

What this country needs now is a non-partisan approach to solving this economic crisis. Rigid party lines are more of a high brick wall, blocking progress in the right direction.

I am non-partisan. To be specific, I am economically conservative and socially liberal. I believe that the best way to solve this national debt problem is to cut spending and raise taxes. In addition, I am pro-life and pro-gay marriage.

My political beliefs combine those of the Democratic and Republican parties. Democrats are, for the most part, pro-gay marriage and pro-raising taxes. Republicans, on the other hand, are more pro-life and pro-spending cuts.

We often judge people based upon their political affiliations. We often associate Republicans with backwoods rednecks who speak with an unintelligible Southern drawl and Democrats with blind politicians concerned more with their public image than with doing what is best for the country.

Often, our particular party affiliations bind us with metaphorical blinders, happy with any action our party does and decrying any action the opposite party does. Sometimes, our party affiliations even cause us to sulk and take an axe to the television when a president from the opposite party is elected.

That happened to me in 2008 when Obama was elected. In the days before the election, I would often engage in intense political debates with my friends about why Republican John McCain would make a better president than Obama.

On Obama’s election night, I continuously pinched myself to make sure I wasn’t dreaming.

In the years since Obama’s election, I have warmed up to him and other Democrats. Do I still think that Democrats are a curse put on mankind? No, absolutely not. Democrats and Republicans both have certain platforms I agree with and certain positions I don’t.

Regardless of our political affiliations, we must try to do what is best for our country in the months leading up to the 2012 election. If keeping Obama in the White House will solve this debt and jobs crisis, I hope you all will join me in cheering when he is reelected. If, however, Obama proves that he needs to go, I hope we will all cheer for his replacement with as much enthusiasm.

I think former president John Kennedy put it best when he said, “Let us not seek the Republican answer or the Democratic answer, but the right answer.”

Now is not the time to fill Congress with one political party. Now is the time to put people who know what they’re doing into power in order to fix this crisis.

Unfair grading causes stir

Public Law 221 was created to set up a new system of accountablitiy for public schools in Indiana. This

Graphic by Summer Haynes

system gives a letter grade A through F much like a student’s report card. Unlike a students report card, however, these grades are based on progress of the schools standardized test scores and not on the quality of them.  Not only is this system of ranking unfair, it is misleading and could eventually produce a counterproductive  result.

This plan is unfair because schools who are producing subpar results are being ranked higher than those who produce excellent results. A school that consistently obtains high test scores will receive a low grading because their improvement rate is low, while a school that improves but still produces low scores will be ranked highly. This is unfair because lower-quality schools are being rewarded for being lower-quality schools.

This grading system is also very misleading for anyone trying to decide what schools are the best in the state of Indiana. Schools given an A are actually schools that have just recently improved and have not consistently been exemplary schools, while consistently high acheiving schools would be listed as C or below. This is as logical as putting a student who improves from an F to a D above an all A student in class rank.

Eventually this system could become counterproductive and cause schools to purposely lower their scores to be able to improve. Supporters of this system may believe taht it will cause positive competition and encourage struggling schools to work harder, but they do not take into account those schools who are not struggling. Eventually these consistent schools will grow weary of not being recognized for their job well done and will lower scores in order to raise them.

The solution to the problem of Public Law 221 is simple. Schools cannot be graded solely on improvement in test scores. While this should be a factor of the grade a school recieves, other factors such as consistency in test scores, graduation rates, and conduct should be considered as well.

Everyone would agree that this system would be an inappropriate way to grade students, so why should it be applied to schools? Not only is it unfair, misleading, and potentially counterproductive, it is blatanly one-dimensial.

October 14, 2011

Page 1                               Page 9                               Page 17                               Page 25

Page 2                               Page 10                             Page 18                               Page 26

Page 3                               Page 11                             Page 19                               Page 27

Page 4                               Page 12                             Page 20                               Page 28

Page 5                               Page 13                             Page 21                               Page 29

Page 6                               Page 14                             Page 22                               Page 30

Page 7                               Page 15                             Page 23                               Page 31

Page 8                               Page 16                             Page 24                               Page 32